In this paper, the response of two-dimensional framed structures made of rectangular cells to the sudden removal of columns is studied. A simulation algorithm based on the discrete-element method is employed, where the structural elements are represented by elasto-plastic Euler-Bernoulli beams with elongation-rotation failure threshold. The effect of structural cell slenderness and of topological hierarchy on the dynamic residual strength after damage R1 is investigated. Topologically hierarchical frames have a primary structure made of a few massive elements, while homogeneous frames are made of many thin elements. It is also shown how R1 depends on the activated collapse mechanisms, which are determined by the mechanical hierarchy between beams and columns, i.e., by their relative strength and stiffness. Finally, principles of robustness-oriented capacity design that seem to be in contrast to the conventional antiseismic capacity design are addressed.
Hierarchical structures for a robustness-oriented capacity design / Masoero, Enrico; F. K., Wittel; H. J., Herrmann; Chiaia, Bernardino. - In: JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS. - ISSN 0733-9399. - STAMPA. - 138:11(2012), pp. 1339-1347. [10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000437]
Hierarchical structures for a robustness-oriented capacity design
MASOERO, ENRICO;CHIAIA, Bernardino
2012
Abstract
In this paper, the response of two-dimensional framed structures made of rectangular cells to the sudden removal of columns is studied. A simulation algorithm based on the discrete-element method is employed, where the structural elements are represented by elasto-plastic Euler-Bernoulli beams with elongation-rotation failure threshold. The effect of structural cell slenderness and of topological hierarchy on the dynamic residual strength after damage R1 is investigated. Topologically hierarchical frames have a primary structure made of a few massive elements, while homogeneous frames are made of many thin elements. It is also shown how R1 depends on the activated collapse mechanisms, which are determined by the mechanical hierarchy between beams and columns, i.e., by their relative strength and stiffness. Finally, principles of robustness-oriented capacity design that seem to be in contrast to the conventional antiseismic capacity design are addressed.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2513813
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo