When fracture occurs in a concrete dam, the crack mouth is typically exposed to water. Very often this phenomenon occurs at the dam-foundation joint and is driven also by the fluid pressure inside the crack. Since the joint is the weakest point in the structure, this evolutionary process determines the load bearing capacity of the dam. In this paper the cracked joint is analyzed through the cohesive model proposed by Cocchetti et al. [Cocchetti G, Maier G, Shen X. Piecewise linear models for interfaces and mixed mode cohesive cracks. J Engng Mech (ASCE) 2002;3:279-98.], which takes into account the coupled degradation of normal and tangential strength. The water pressure inside the crack, which reduces fracture energy and increases the driving forces, is analyzed through the model proposed by Reich et al. [Reich W, Bruhwiler E, Slowik V, Saouma VE. Experimental and computational aspects of a water/fracture interaction. In: Bourdarot E, Mazars J, Saouma V, editors, Dam Fracture and Damage, The Netherlands: Balkema; 1994. p. 123-31.] and Bruhwiler and Saouma [Bruhwiler E, Saouma VE. Water fracture interaction in concrete. Part II: Fracture properties. Am Concr Inst J 1995;92:296-303; Bruhwiler E, Saouma VE. Water fracture interaction in concrete. Part II: Hydrostatic pressure in cracks. Am Concr Inst J 1995;92:383-90.]. Some numerical results are presented which refer to the benchmark problem proposed in 1999 by the International Commission On Large Dams. During the evolutionary process the horizontal dam crest displacement has been found to be a monotonic increasing function of the external load multiplier. As the fictitious process zone moves from the upstream to the downstream edge a transition occurs in the path of crack formation: the initial phase is dominated by the opening displacement, on the contrary afterwards the shear displacement dominates. Therefore, crack initiation does not depend on dilatancy. On the contrary the load carrying capacity depends on dilatancy.

Modeling water penetration at dam-foundation joint / Barpi, Fabrizio; Valente, Silvio. - In: ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS. - ISSN 0013-7944. - STAMPA. - 75/3-4:(2008), pp. 629-642. [10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.008]

Modeling water penetration at dam-foundation joint

BARPI, Fabrizio;VALENTE, Silvio
2008

Abstract

When fracture occurs in a concrete dam, the crack mouth is typically exposed to water. Very often this phenomenon occurs at the dam-foundation joint and is driven also by the fluid pressure inside the crack. Since the joint is the weakest point in the structure, this evolutionary process determines the load bearing capacity of the dam. In this paper the cracked joint is analyzed through the cohesive model proposed by Cocchetti et al. [Cocchetti G, Maier G, Shen X. Piecewise linear models for interfaces and mixed mode cohesive cracks. J Engng Mech (ASCE) 2002;3:279-98.], which takes into account the coupled degradation of normal and tangential strength. The water pressure inside the crack, which reduces fracture energy and increases the driving forces, is analyzed through the model proposed by Reich et al. [Reich W, Bruhwiler E, Slowik V, Saouma VE. Experimental and computational aspects of a water/fracture interaction. In: Bourdarot E, Mazars J, Saouma V, editors, Dam Fracture and Damage, The Netherlands: Balkema; 1994. p. 123-31.] and Bruhwiler and Saouma [Bruhwiler E, Saouma VE. Water fracture interaction in concrete. Part II: Fracture properties. Am Concr Inst J 1995;92:296-303; Bruhwiler E, Saouma VE. Water fracture interaction in concrete. Part II: Hydrostatic pressure in cracks. Am Concr Inst J 1995;92:383-90.]. Some numerical results are presented which refer to the benchmark problem proposed in 1999 by the International Commission On Large Dams. During the evolutionary process the horizontal dam crest displacement has been found to be a monotonic increasing function of the external load multiplier. As the fictitious process zone moves from the upstream to the downstream edge a transition occurs in the path of crack formation: the initial phase is dominated by the opening displacement, on the contrary afterwards the shear displacement dominates. Therefore, crack initiation does not depend on dilatancy. On the contrary the load carrying capacity depends on dilatancy.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
efm07porto.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 1. Preprint / submitted version [pre- review]
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 776.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
776.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2288333
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo