The contemporary architectural discourse grapples with the elusive definition of architecture itself, a consequence of the century-long divergence between Architecture and Design. This paper examines architecture not as a fixed entity but as an emergent phenomenon: something that happens under specific conditions rather than something that inherently is. By tracing the evolution of architectural practice, the study highlights the growing disconnect between conceptual vision and technological execution, a divide exacerbated by the linear, stage-driven design processes dominant in Western traditions. Through case studies of iconic projects, the paper reveals the fragility of visionary ideals when confronted with practical constraints, normative complexities, and shifting systemic conditions. It critiques the romanticised notion of the architect as a heroic figure whose singular vision withstands all challenges, arguing instead for a systemic conception of design. In this framework, architecture emerges through a morphogenetic process in which multiple ideals coexist and adapt to evolving constraints, fostering responsive cohesion among aesthetic, technical, and ethical dimensions. Central to this argument is the tactical role of technology. By anticipating key technological details early in the design process, architects can transform rigid ideals into flexible systems, navigating unforeseen challenges while preserving the core vision. Examples demonstrate how technological integration can anchor architectural intent, ensuring formative success. Ultimately, the paper advocates a paradigm shift: from linear, principle-driven ethics to a systemic ethics of responsibility, in which architecture’s ontological uncertainty becomes its strength. By embracing tactical flexibility and the glider-like persistence of key details, architects can mitigate despondency and reclaim agency in an increasingly fragmented discipline. The study concludes with a call to reimagine architectural practice as a dynamic interplay of vision, technology, and adaptive coherence.

Vision and despondency. Technology as a tactical tool for architectural design / Deregibus, C. - In: A fronteira invisível / The invisible frontier / Pereira Martins C.. - ELETTRONICO. - Lisboa : EA Editora, 2026. - ISBN 9789893400852. - pp. 201-233

Vision and despondency. Technology as a tactical tool for architectural design.

Deregibus Carlo
2026

Abstract

The contemporary architectural discourse grapples with the elusive definition of architecture itself, a consequence of the century-long divergence between Architecture and Design. This paper examines architecture not as a fixed entity but as an emergent phenomenon: something that happens under specific conditions rather than something that inherently is. By tracing the evolution of architectural practice, the study highlights the growing disconnect between conceptual vision and technological execution, a divide exacerbated by the linear, stage-driven design processes dominant in Western traditions. Through case studies of iconic projects, the paper reveals the fragility of visionary ideals when confronted with practical constraints, normative complexities, and shifting systemic conditions. It critiques the romanticised notion of the architect as a heroic figure whose singular vision withstands all challenges, arguing instead for a systemic conception of design. In this framework, architecture emerges through a morphogenetic process in which multiple ideals coexist and adapt to evolving constraints, fostering responsive cohesion among aesthetic, technical, and ethical dimensions. Central to this argument is the tactical role of technology. By anticipating key technological details early in the design process, architects can transform rigid ideals into flexible systems, navigating unforeseen challenges while preserving the core vision. Examples demonstrate how technological integration can anchor architectural intent, ensuring formative success. Ultimately, the paper advocates a paradigm shift: from linear, principle-driven ethics to a systemic ethics of responsibility, in which architecture’s ontological uncertainty becomes its strength. By embracing tactical flexibility and the glider-like persistence of key details, architects can mitigate despondency and reclaim agency in an increasingly fragmented discipline. The study concludes with a call to reimagine architectural practice as a dynamic interplay of vision, technology, and adaptive coherence.
2026
9789893400852
A fronteira invisível / The invisible frontier
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C - 2026 - deregibus - the invisible frontier - vision and despondency.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2a Post-print versione editoriale / Version of Record
Licenza: Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.79 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/3012793