PORTO @ 
Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishScholars and practitioners have adopted a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative methodologies to assess and evaluate City Logistics (CL) projects. Traditionally, the aim of CL assessment was to solve optimization problems and thus depicting the response of private actors to the introduction of public policies. Other methodologies, such as Multi-criteria Decision Making models (MCDM) or survey-based methods, have been put forward in recent years with the evaluation objective in mind. More in general, CL assessment and evaluation should take into account the many stakeholders that are affected by the introduction of new CL policies. In this chapter a literature review aimed at providing insights into the ability of existing methods taking into account the objectives of various stakeholders is proposed. Moreover, existing literature will be addressed in terms of quantitative vs. qualitative methodologies, so as to highlight the strengths and potential shortcomings of both approaches in relation to the CL assessment goal.
A Literature Review of City Logistics Assessment and Evaluation Methodologies / Zenezini, Giovanni. - ELETTRONICO. - 1(2019).
| Titolo: | A Literature Review of City Logistics Assessment and Evaluation Methodologies |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 |
| Titolo del libro: | Sustainable City Logistics Planning: Methods and Applications. Volume 1 |
| Abstract: | Scholars and practitioners have adopted a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative methodolog...ies to assess and evaluate City Logistics (CL) projects. Traditionally, the aim of CL assessment was to solve optimization problems and thus depicting the response of private actors to the introduction of public policies. Other methodologies, such as Multi-criteria Decision Making models (MCDM) or survey-based methods, have been put forward in recent years with the evaluation objective in mind. More in general, CL assessment and evaluation should take into account the many stakeholders that are affected by the introduction of new CL policies. In this chapter a literature review aimed at providing insights into the ability of existing methods taking into account the objectives of various stakeholders is proposed. Moreover, existing literature will be addressed in terms of quantitative vs. qualitative methodologies, so as to highlight the strengths and potential shortcomings of both approaches in relation to the CL assessment goal. |
| ISBN: | 978-1-53616-521-0 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giovanni Zenezini proposal_R1.pdf | Post print | 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript | PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati | Visibile a tuttiVisualizza/Apri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2781053
Copyright © 2021