This contribution is divided in two parts, dealing with the “European Spatial Development Perspective” (ESDP) from two different sides. In the first part, the meaning of “spatial development” is analysed and discussed in relation to the concept of territorial cohesion, as it has been recently developed in the Community Treaties and policy’s documents. The analysis is then widened to the modalities and policies of development, as they are currently present, especially in Southern Europe, in terms of polycentrism and of local development. They are seen as means for a valorisation of diversified territorial and human resources, which are the essential elements of European competitiveness. In the second part, the meaning of “European perspective” is treated and discussed in relation to the shared objective of territorial cohesion. A comparison between the emerging perspectives on European spatial planning and, in particular, the experience from Southern Europe suggest that a possible next ESDP should not be limited to represent a common perspective of spatial development, but it could and should rather aspire to indicate shared principles of territorial governance in the scope of cohesion.
For a South European and Italian perspective in the "next ESDP" / Dematteis, Giuseppe; JANIN RIVOLIN YOCCOZ, Umberto - In: The process of territorial cohesion in Europe / Pedrazzini L.. - STAMPA. - Milano : Franco Angeli, 2006. - ISBN 9788846423221. - pp. 103-117
For a South European and Italian perspective in the "next ESDP"
DEMATTEIS, Giuseppe;JANIN RIVOLIN YOCCOZ, Umberto
2006
Abstract
This contribution is divided in two parts, dealing with the “European Spatial Development Perspective” (ESDP) from two different sides. In the first part, the meaning of “spatial development” is analysed and discussed in relation to the concept of territorial cohesion, as it has been recently developed in the Community Treaties and policy’s documents. The analysis is then widened to the modalities and policies of development, as they are currently present, especially in Southern Europe, in terms of polycentrism and of local development. They are seen as means for a valorisation of diversified territorial and human resources, which are the essential elements of European competitiveness. In the second part, the meaning of “European perspective” is treated and discussed in relation to the shared objective of territorial cohesion. A comparison between the emerging perspectives on European spatial planning and, in particular, the experience from Southern Europe suggest that a possible next ESDP should not be limited to represent a common perspective of spatial development, but it could and should rather aspire to indicate shared principles of territorial governance in the scope of cohesion.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11583/1533626
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo