<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T23:37:39Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:iris.polito.it:11583/2501681" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://iris.polito.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iris.polito.it:11583/2501681</identifier><datestamp>2023-05-16T08:17:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_11583_2614433</setSpec><setSpec>com_11583_2614425</setSpec><setSpec>col_11583_2614423</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Assessment of ergonomic methods for the quantification of biomechanical load in manufacturing systems</dc:title>
<dc:creator>GHIBAUDO, LIDIA</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Ghibaudo, Lidia</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>Ergonomic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject> manufacturing system</dc:subject>
<dc:subject> biomechanical load</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Settore ING-IND/34 - Bioingegneria Industriale</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The Italian legislation, D.Lgs 81, obliges the employer to evaluate all risks, including&#xd;
the biomechanical risk, for guaranteeing the health and safety of workers according to&#xd;
the technical standards. The assessment of the biomechanical load risk consists in the&#xd;
evaluation of the musculoskeletal efforts, quantifying the main biomechanical factors&#xd;
correlated to musculoskeletal disorders: applied forces, repetitive movements, postures&#xd;
engaged during the working tasks and the net duration of the working tasks taking into&#xd;
account adequate recovery periods.&#xd;
The Ph.D. subject focused on physical ergonomics for manufacturing system and it is&#xd;
born in the framework of the agreement of research cooperation signed by Fiat Grouped&#xd;
Automobiles and Politecnico di Torino.&#xd;
In a first step of the research activity, the methods of risk assessment mentioned in the&#xd;
legislation and widely recognized in the literature were analyzed to evaluate their&#xd;
applicability in different industrial contests.&#xd;
The methods of risk assessment mentioned in the standards are simple observational&#xd;
techniques that consist in pro forma sheet methods and are applicable in specific&#xd;
industrial realities as they refer to particular technical actions and body districts.&#xd;
These characteristics of the methods imply limits of applicability in complex industrial&#xd;
realities, as for example assembly lines.&#xd;
D.Lgs 81/08 also obliges workplace and plant designers to comply with general&#xd;
principles of prevention and protection of the health and safety of workers already at the&#xd;
design phase. D.Lgs 81/08 directly correlated to the Machinery Directive, that requires&#xd;
compliance with CEN standards related to Safety and Ergonomics for all new or&#xd;
updated machineries.&#xd;
Applicability of observational methods in the design phase is limited because, at this&#xd;
stage, data necessary to correctly compile methods may be lacking.&#xd;
With reference to the trend that can be observed in the scientific literature, holistic&#xd;
assessment of the risk as well as multi method evaluation should be applied in order to&#xd;
allow, in the next phases of prototype and production, a deeper understanding of the&#xd;
different main risk factors relating to each body districts.After defining benchmarking parameters, an experimental procedure of method&#xd;
evaluation was programmed.&#xd;
Significant samples of workstations were collected and analyzed in order to assess the&#xd;
robustness and the compliance of some methods of particular interest for application in&#xd;
the design phase (Simulation tools, Checklist di Torino and EAWS method) with&#xd;
respect to the methods mentioned in standards.&#xd;
In a second step of the research work, in collaboration with the sector of Ergonomics&#xd;
and Work Medicine of the University of Turin, focus was posed on the improvement&#xd;
and validation of a first screening tool for the holistic assessment of the biomechanical&#xd;
risk of different body districts. The experimental procedures developed in the first phase&#xd;
of the research activity were used to determine suitable cut–off values for the traffic&#xd;
light indication according to legislation. This tool answers to the current demands for&#xd;
having simple and user-friendly tools and methods for the risk assessment and&#xd;
management to use in the design and screening phase by national and international&#xd;
agencies as well as operators of small and medium enterprises. It’s worth to remember&#xd;
that these kind of tools and methods must be reliable with respect to methods mentioned&#xd;
in standards, in order to assure compliance with the legal requirements.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2012</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2501681</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>numberofpages:127</dc:relation>
<dc:publisher>Politecnico di Torino</dc:publisher>
<dc:publisher>country:Italy</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>