The accurate measurement of contact interface parameters is of great importance for nonlinear dynamic response computations since there is a lack of predictive capabilities for such input parameters. Several test rigs have been developed at different institutions, and a series of measurements published, but their reliability remains unknown due to a lack of direct comparisons. To somehow address this issue, a Round-Robin test campaign was performed including the high frequency friction rigs of Imperial College London and Politecnico di Torino. Comparable hysteresis loops were recorded on specimen pairs manufactured from the same batch of raw stainless steel, for a wide range of test conditions, including varying normal loads, sliding distances and nominal areas of contact. Measurements from the two rigs were compared to quantify the level of agreement between the two very different experimental setup, showing a reasonably good matching in the results, but also highlighting some differences. Results also demonstrated that loading conditions can strongly affect the contact parameters, and consequently their effect must be included in future nonlinear dynamic simulations for more reliable predictions.

Comparison of contact parameters measured with two different friction rigs for nonlinear dynamic analysis / Fantetti, A.; Pennisi, C.; Botto, D.; Zucca, S.; Schwingshackl, C.. - (2020), pp. 2165-2174. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2020 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2020 and 2020 International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics, USD 2020 tenutosi a Leuven, Belgio nel 2020).

Comparison of contact parameters measured with two different friction rigs for nonlinear dynamic analysis

Botto D.;Zucca S.;
2020

Abstract

The accurate measurement of contact interface parameters is of great importance for nonlinear dynamic response computations since there is a lack of predictive capabilities for such input parameters. Several test rigs have been developed at different institutions, and a series of measurements published, but their reliability remains unknown due to a lack of direct comparisons. To somehow address this issue, a Round-Robin test campaign was performed including the high frequency friction rigs of Imperial College London and Politecnico di Torino. Comparable hysteresis loops were recorded on specimen pairs manufactured from the same batch of raw stainless steel, for a wide range of test conditions, including varying normal loads, sliding distances and nominal areas of contact. Measurements from the two rigs were compared to quantify the level of agreement between the two very different experimental setup, showing a reasonably good matching in the results, but also highlighting some differences. Results also demonstrated that loading conditions can strongly affect the contact parameters, and consequently their effect must be included in future nonlinear dynamic simulations for more reliable predictions.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 ISMA - Round Robin.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: 2. Post-print / Author's Accepted Manuscript
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2933356