The essay takes into consideration two problems related to Vitruvius and Piero della Francesca that have remained unexplained up to now and are not even recognized as such by the modern exegetes of De prospectiva pingendi: the length of the plinth of the Attic base (Book III, propositio sexta) and the size of the concavity of the abacus of the composite capital (Book III, propositio septima). In both cases the numerical data reveal Piero’s impossibility to offer solutions to faulty passages of the Vitruvian codices, all with numerous errors. Piero’s condition is the same as Leon Battista Alberti: neither is a philologist. The study also explains the dimensional oscillations proposed by Alberti for the plinth side. The essay is an opportunity to «unmask» a plagiarism by Luca Pacioli precisely in relation to the two main themes examined here.

Due "quaestiones" vitruviane riconosciute: la base attica e il capitello composito nel Terzo Libro del "De prospectiva pingendi" di Piero della Francesca e un plagio conclamato di Luca Pacioli / Two recognized vitruvian problems: the attic base and the composite capital in the Third Book of "De prospectiva pingendi" by Piero della Francesca and an evident plagiarism by Luca Pacioli / Di Teodoro, Francesco P.. - In: ESPACIO, TIEMPO Y FORMA. SERIE VII, HISTORIA DEL ARTE. - ISSN 1130-4715. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:serie VII Historia del arte(2019), pp. 41-63. [10.5944/etfvii.7.2019]

Due "quaestiones" vitruviane riconosciute: la base attica e il capitello composito nel Terzo Libro del "De prospectiva pingendi" di Piero della Francesca e un plagio conclamato di Luca Pacioli / Two recognized vitruvian problems: the attic base and the composite capital in the Third Book of "De prospectiva pingendi" by Piero della Francesca and an evident plagiarism by Luca Pacioli

Francesco P. Di Teodoro
2019

Abstract

The essay takes into consideration two problems related to Vitruvius and Piero della Francesca that have remained unexplained up to now and are not even recognized as such by the modern exegetes of De prospectiva pingendi: the length of the plinth of the Attic base (Book III, propositio sexta) and the size of the concavity of the abacus of the composite capital (Book III, propositio septima). In both cases the numerical data reveal Piero’s impossibility to offer solutions to faulty passages of the Vitruvian codices, all with numerous errors. Piero’s condition is the same as Leon Battista Alberti: neither is a philologist. The study also explains the dimensional oscillations proposed by Alberti for the plinth side. The essay is an opportunity to «unmask» a plagiarism by Luca Pacioli precisely in relation to the two main themes examined here.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2774052
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo