The present paper describes the comparison of two variant of the same regional turboprop aircraft using the AGILE’s collaborative MDO process. The two turboprop aircraft are both characterized by the same Top Level Aircraft Requirements, but with a different engine positions. The requirements are provided by the industrial partner (Leonardo – Aircraft Division) leading to two aircraft configurations with wing and rear mounted propulsion system. A complete aircraft preliminary design is carried out to understand the effect of engine position considering all the main design disciplines. 13 engine design cases related to different flight conditions and engine ratings are considered to select engine cycle and size. Baseline engine size is defined by high shaft power requirements at max continuous conditions and by power and thrust requirement at other design cases. Improvement of cruise installed SFC of baseline engine by 6-7% is shown to reach given preliminary requirement on cruise SFC level. The results of the two aircraft are obtained and compared, showing that the rear mounted engine configuration can reach higher cruise speeds, despite slight increments of on-board systems weight and required mission fuel.

Comparative Study of Advanced Turboprop Aircraft with Wing and Rear Mounted Propulsion System in the Agile EU project / Mirzoyan, Artur; Isianov, Alik; Cerino, Giovanni; Vecchia, Pierluigi D.; Stingo, Luca; Fioriti, Marco; Boggero, Luca; Tomasella, Francesca; Prakasha, Prajwal S.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2018). (Intervento presentato al convegno 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference tenutosi a Cincinnati (USA) nel 9 - 11 July 2018) [10.2514/6.2018-4849].

Comparative Study of Advanced Turboprop Aircraft with Wing and Rear Mounted Propulsion System in the Agile EU project

Fioriti, Marco;Boggero, Luca;Tomasella, Francesca;
2018

Abstract

The present paper describes the comparison of two variant of the same regional turboprop aircraft using the AGILE’s collaborative MDO process. The two turboprop aircraft are both characterized by the same Top Level Aircraft Requirements, but with a different engine positions. The requirements are provided by the industrial partner (Leonardo – Aircraft Division) leading to two aircraft configurations with wing and rear mounted propulsion system. A complete aircraft preliminary design is carried out to understand the effect of engine position considering all the main design disciplines. 13 engine design cases related to different flight conditions and engine ratings are considered to select engine cycle and size. Baseline engine size is defined by high shaft power requirements at max continuous conditions and by power and thrust requirement at other design cases. Improvement of cruise installed SFC of baseline engine by 6-7% is shown to reach given preliminary requirement on cruise SFC level. The results of the two aircraft are obtained and compared, showing that the rear mounted engine configuration can reach higher cruise speeds, despite slight increments of on-board systems weight and required mission fuel.
2018
978-1-62410-570-8
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2730388
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo