This study aims at evaluating the influence of epistemic uncertainties in shear wave velocity (VS) on seismic ground response analyses (GRAs). A number of alternative VS profiles obtained from both invasive (i.e., borehole) and non-invasive (i.e., surface waves) testing methods are available for two blind study sites. These profiles are used to estimate epistemic uncertainties in VS, which are then propagated through equivalent linear-elastic GRAs, allowing for the quantification of intra-method uncertainty and inter-method variability in terms of spectral accelerations, amplification functions, and ‘damage parameters’ (i.e., Arias and Housner intensities). This study demonstrates that nonlinearity of soil response plays a fundamental role in increasing the propagated uncertainty in GRA. Additionally, GRAs were also performed by means of VS upper/lower range profiles developed from assumptions commonly used to account for epistemic uncertainties. These VS profiles were found to yield unrealistic site response estimates for both low strain (i.e., linear-elastic) and high strain (i.e., non-linear) levels.

Influence of epistemic uncertainty in shear wave velocity on seismic ground response analyses / Passeri, Federico; Foti, Sebastiano; Cox, Brady R.; RODRIGUEZ MAREK, Adrian. - In: EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA. - ISSN 8755-2930. - STAMPA. - 35:2(2019), pp. 929-954. [10.1193/011018EQS005M]

Influence of epistemic uncertainty in shear wave velocity on seismic ground response analyses

Federico Passeri;Sebastiano Foti;Adrian Rodriguez-Marek
2019

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating the influence of epistemic uncertainties in shear wave velocity (VS) on seismic ground response analyses (GRAs). A number of alternative VS profiles obtained from both invasive (i.e., borehole) and non-invasive (i.e., surface waves) testing methods are available for two blind study sites. These profiles are used to estimate epistemic uncertainties in VS, which are then propagated through equivalent linear-elastic GRAs, allowing for the quantification of intra-method uncertainty and inter-method variability in terms of spectral accelerations, amplification functions, and ‘damage parameters’ (i.e., Arias and Housner intensities). This study demonstrates that nonlinearity of soil response plays a fundamental role in increasing the propagated uncertainty in GRA. Additionally, GRAs were also performed by means of VS upper/lower range profiles developed from assumptions commonly used to account for epistemic uncertainties. These VS profiles were found to yield unrealistic site response estimates for both low strain (i.e., linear-elastic) and high strain (i.e., non-linear) levels.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2716044
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo