Aim The objective of this study was to predict contact points and pressure distribution against canal walls when using NiTi rotary instruments by FEM virtual simulation. Methodology ProTaper Next (PTN) X1 and ProTaper Universal (PTU) S2 were compared. Canal configuration was based on an in vitro testing device. The in vitro canal and file geometries were replicated with computer aided design (CAD) software. CAD geometries (geometrical model) were imported and discretized (numerical model). The typical material model of dentine and MWire alloy was applied. The numerical models of the device and file geometries were used for finite element analysis (FEA). Experimental data from PTN X1 and PTU S2 were used to set-up the material parameter in the numerical model. Stress histories on the root canal contact points patterns due to the PTN X1 and PTU S2 were compared. Results The pressure distribution against canal walls was mainly influenced by the geometry of the file. The material of the file did not affect significantly the results. The PTN X1 was associated with a pressure 80% lower than PTU S2. Conclusions The pressure distribution against canal walls may be predicted by FEA. Virtual design, testing and analysis of file geometries could save considerable time and resources during instrument development.

Prediction of contact points and pressures against canal walls of NiTi rotary files by virtual modeling and finite elements analysis / Scattina, Alessandro; Gibello, U.; Alovisi, M.; Paolino, Davide Salvatore; Pasqualini, D.; Scotti, N.; Chiandussi, Giorgio; Berutti, E.. - STAMPA. - (2015). (Intervento presentato al convegno 17th Biennial ESE European Society of Endodontology Congress tenutosi a Barcelona, Spain nel 16-19 settembre 2015) [10.1111/iej.12496].

Prediction of contact points and pressures against canal walls of NiTi rotary files by virtual modeling and finite elements analysis

SCATTINA, ALESSANDRO;PAOLINO, Davide Salvatore;CHIANDUSSI, Giorgio;
2015

Abstract

Aim The objective of this study was to predict contact points and pressure distribution against canal walls when using NiTi rotary instruments by FEM virtual simulation. Methodology ProTaper Next (PTN) X1 and ProTaper Universal (PTU) S2 were compared. Canal configuration was based on an in vitro testing device. The in vitro canal and file geometries were replicated with computer aided design (CAD) software. CAD geometries (geometrical model) were imported and discretized (numerical model). The typical material model of dentine and MWire alloy was applied. The numerical models of the device and file geometries were used for finite element analysis (FEA). Experimental data from PTN X1 and PTU S2 were used to set-up the material parameter in the numerical model. Stress histories on the root canal contact points patterns due to the PTN X1 and PTU S2 were compared. Results The pressure distribution against canal walls was mainly influenced by the geometry of the file. The material of the file did not affect significantly the results. The PTN X1 was associated with a pressure 80% lower than PTU S2. Conclusions The pressure distribution against canal walls may be predicted by FEA. Virtual design, testing and analysis of file geometries could save considerable time and resources during instrument development.
2015
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11583/2619266
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo